About
This web log was created to give me a site to catalog the various news articles and web pages I find interesting throughout my travels on the internet. Most of the content is simply pasted in from the various RSS feeds that I subscribe to.
Since you’re here viewing this, hopefully some of my interests mirror your own, and you find this log saves you time, entertains and possibly even informs!
- Jason
You are a dumbshit. I highly doubt if you know anything about football. Please spare us and get a new hobby!
Lewis
January 31, 2007 at 12:48 am
Would you mind getting in touch with us about the use of the T-rex image, made by and belonging to us which we were not asked for permission to use.
The Makers of the T-rex
July 10, 2007 at 11:18 am
The image in question has been removed.
Jason Jeffrey
July 10, 2007 at 1:49 pm
LOL! Hey I wanna peice of that T-Rex $$$$! Great work J on the site…and great name too! Thanks for your tireless efforts on exposing Favre as the fraud that he is.
Jason W.
August 9, 2007 at 7:46 pm
Hi,
You’re linking to my old Linux blog in your Blogroll, but I’ve moved from easylinux.wordpress to http://blog.dantup.me.uk/search/label/Ubuntu
Danny Tuppeny
August 20, 2007 at 7:28 am
Hey Buddy,
Add another INT to the count!
Joan
September 9, 2007 at 10:38 pm
:)
bibomedia
February 29, 2008 at 5:14 am
The image posted on your “N. Korea Warns of ‘Merciless’ Nuclear Offensive” of Kim Jong Il is original, COPYRIGHTED, artwork commissioned by Energy Tribune Publishing Inc. Please provide a link back to our web site (http://www.energytribune.com/) and provide us with credit for the use of our image. I saw you removed my last comment on this issue. At least, contact us about you stealing our image so we can avoid any legal action.
Energy Tribune Admin
June 26, 2009 at 10:38 am
A small amount of investigation would show that your accusations are unfounded and baseless. Using your image in a post was never intended as “theft” of your “original, COPYRIGHTED artwork.” Pursuant to your initial request, the image in question was attributed to http://www.energytribune.com in the caption, and the link tied to the image itself directs the browser to the very same site, http://www.energytribune.com. Contrary to your allegation, your initial comment on this issue was not removed in any way. It was caught in the spam filter.
I have complied with your original request; this follow-up request is unnecessary, as you would have known if you had taken the time to check the posting in question. Your threats of legal action are unwarranted and ridiculous.
Jason Jeffrey
June 26, 2009 at 12:27 pm
Jason, I’m curious, like I said in my 1st post about this, I see the image of Kim Jong II used on several other websites.
On some sites, the photo is cropped showing just the head and the hand. Other sites show the full body with a blue runner along the balcony. And then the one you use doesn’t appear to have the blue runner but seems to be slightly…just a hair… enhanced.
Does merely cropping the photo and doing a hair of enhancement make it “an original artwork” that can be copyrighted?
Warren
June 26, 2009 at 12:39 pm
Dude…Energytribune moron… the Kim Jong II photo…are you out of your freaking mind? …either that or you’ve got a hell of a busy legal department that is costing you money out of your ass for no reason.
That photo of lil’ Kimmy and various cropped versions of it are everywhere. Go to google and do an image search. You’ll find it used by The Onion, ABC, the UK Telegraph newssite (where it is attributed to Reuters!!!) and that’s just naming a few.
Given the wide use of this photo, it looks to be in the “public domain”.
And if you truely do have the photo COPYRIGHTED, what in the hell are you doing going after a little old blogger? If I had that photo COPYRIGHTED, I’d being going after The Onion, ABC, the Telegraph… you know, companies that you know have money!!!
To quote that famous philosopher Bugs Bunny…”Shesh, what a maroon!”
Warren
June 26, 2009 at 12:30 pm
Changing the original does not then constitute it now being your original; therefore it would still violate the copyright held by the originating party.
Jason Jeffrey
June 29, 2009 at 12:22 pm