Oprah, Obama, Rev. Jeremiah Wright and the Israeli Ethnic Bomb
Ali Baghdadi, a self proclaimed Arab-American activist and advisor to nutjobs Elijah Muhammad (the founder of the Nation of Islam) and Minister Louis Farrakhan, penned an open letter to Oprah which was published on the Pastor’s Page section in the June 10th, 2007 Youth Day edition of the Trinity United Church of Christ’s bulletin. I invite you to take a look at the entire bulletin (PDF) with your own eyes, but some of the better excerpts are below:
“I am so glad that you will be visiting my country, Palestine. I wish if I could be there to greet you. Certainly, despite the genocide and ethnic cleansing they face every hour of the day, my people will be there. They will be happy to see you and will receive you with open arms.”
“Many pregnant Arab women have lost their babies while waiting for clearance on their way to hospitals.”
“Though the water we get does not meet our basic needs, notice the swimming pools Israelis enjoy in settlements built on our stolen lands.”
“During the Second Intifadah, the uprising against Israeli occupation, Muslim and Christian activists, chased by the Israeli death squads, were given refuge in the church.”
“I must tell you that Israel was the closest ally to the White Supremacists of South Africa. In fact, South Africa allowed Israel to test its nuclear weapons in the ocean off South Africa. The Israelis were given a blank check: they could test whenever they desired and did not even have to ask permission. Both worked on an ethnic bomb that kills Blacks and Arabs.”
“Arabs have always supported the dismantling of this racist government. In 1962, African-Arab Sudan granted Mandela a passport to travel with to gain international support in his struggle to free his people. Libya, among other Arab states, provided Mandela and other African liberation movements, political as well as material support. As a result, Libya was designated by the White House as a terrorist rogue state. What a great honor! “
OBAMA IS A FAKE!!!!!!!!! HE’S A CHARLATON!!!! HE’S LYING OUT THE ASS CRACK OF HIS MOUTH!!!! IF YOU SUPPORT THIS FAKE NOW, YOU”RE A FREAKING IDIOT!!!!
And I’m not even talking about his ties to Rev. Wright. I’m talking about the man’s character. Obama claims to be a champion of the poor and underprividged, correct? President George W. Bush is suppose to be “pure evil”, correct?
THEN WHY THE HELL DID “THE EVIL” PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH DONATE MORE TO CHARITY THEN OBAMA!?!?!?!?! HOW COULD SUPPOSEDLY THE SON OF SATAN HIMSELF, PRESIDENT BUSH, OUT DONATE THE SECOND COMING OF JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF, OBAMA, BY 30%?!?!?! AND PRESIDENT BUSH MADE LESS MONEY!!!!!
Per the official 2006 Tax Return information reported to the press, the Obama’s donated $60,307 to charity out of their combined income of $991,296. President Bush and his wife, donated $78,100 to charity out of their $765,801 combined Adjusted Gross Income for 2006. Bush donated $17,793 MORE then Obama while making $225,495 less!!!! Dividing the $17,793 by the base number of Obama’s donations of $60,307 shows you that President Bush donated 30% more then Barack “Son of God” Obama.
If Obama is supposedly soooo much more concerned about the common man, so much more concerned about the poor then “EVIL INCARNATE” President George W. Bush, how come he didn’t donate more to charities?!? Answer: HE’S LYING THROUGH HIS ASS WHEN HE SAYS HE’S OH-SO CONCERNED ABOUT THE POOR!!!! Its called lying to the masses of America just to get elected you idiots!!!
Come on Obama backers, where are you at? Respond please! Explain to me how if President Bush is suppose to be so evil, how could he donate more money to charity while making way less money then Barack(sp?) Obama??????
Warren
March 31, 2008 at 9:01 am
Warren,
You right-wing wacko, relax.
You’re lookng at donations for one year. GW’s net worth is millions of dollars more than Obama’s. Although GW only made 765K this year, according to Slate magazine, he has a net worth of around $9 million to $26 million. And you can bet its closer to 26 million.
Obama on the other hand has assets of only $1.3 million.
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/moneymag/0712/gallery.candidates.moneymag/5.html
Go pull out your calculator and rerun the numbers to see what % of total assets were given to charity and see who gave more.
Geez, I thought you were just clueless when it came to Favre.
ADA
April 2, 2008 at 7:33 pm
Um ADA,
First off, there’s a difference between “Total Assets” and “Net Worth” but I don’t have time to exlain that right now. Hopefully you can figure that out yourself and was just mis-writing.
Okay. Starting off: You don’t measure donations based on total assets. If you have a house valued at $10 Million, you can’t donate $2 Million of value to charity. If you own a company valued at $8 Million, that isn’t saying that you have $8 million cash and that you can donate $3 Million dollars out of that $8 Million to charity. It doesn’t work that way. That is why donation percentages are based off of Income for the year. If anyone can’t understand this concept, I pray to god that they either can’t or don’t vote in the election. Because they lack the basics of common sense, reasoning, and a base sense of logic.
And I was going after Obama on a good year for him. Prior year giving was even worse for Obama. That and I didn’t think it fair to mention Obama’s worse years donating when I had not yet done similar research on President Bush.
Keep in mind here, Obama is the candidate who is running on the “I’m here to help the poor!” platform and considered by many to be “the second coming of Jesus himself”. While President Bush is supposedly the “Son Of Satan” and “Hitler Re-incarnated”. One would think that the guy running on the “I Will Help The Poor” platform to out donate the “Son of Satan”.
In 2005, Obama donated $77,315 out of the $1.6 Million in income. That’s 4.83% donated to charity for 2005.
For the years 2002 to 2004, the Obama’s household income was less then $250,000 per year. My website source (to be given at the end of this article) doesn’t give specifics, so I’m using an average of $249,000 for each year. This comes to $747,000 of total income for the three year period of 2002, 2003, and 2004. Per the source, which you’ll note is ABC News and not Fox News, the Obama’s donated a whoping $6,900 to charity for this three year period. That means out of the $747,000 of income for the 3 year period, the Obama’s donate .92% of their Income to charity.
Let me say that again, FOR THE YEARS 2002, 2003, AND 2004, THE OBAMA’s DONATED LESS THEN 1% OF THIER INCOME TO CHARITY.
For a guy who claims to be a “Champion Of The Poor”, he doesn’t seem to want to give his own money to help the poor much. Oh yeah that’s right, he wants to take OTHER PEOPLE’S money, away from them and give it to the poor through taxes. But he doesn’t want to actually give anything of his own to the Poor. Isn’t that hypocritical? Yes, it is.
Its like when a preacher gets on TV and yells that people who visit prostitutes should all be damned. Yet that very same preacher is seeing a protitute every Saturday night just before the Sunday service.
And I guess that’s why I can’t understand the Democrat followers at the national level. The Democratic leadership and their main supporters are all rich people, just like the Republicans and “evil rich people” that they tell the masses that they are going to go after if they are elected to office. How can people possibly beleive this crap from these people? Do the Democratic followers really beleive that Obama is going to tax himself and his fellow leaders out of their 1.6 Million dollar homes? That John Edwards actually understands the plight of “Joe Six-pack” who’s living paycheck to paycheck when John Edwards pays $400 for a haircut? Who do they think is donating the millions of dollars to Obama and Clinton’s campaigns? They ain’t getting it from Grannies donating $5 a month. They’re getting it from other Millionaires who can afford to pay $50,000 for a table at an Obama Campaign fund raiser.
Dudes, here is the supposed goal/dream of the Democratic Party:
The masses all have the same level of income, (which ends up being a low level of income because there is only so much wealth to spread out, but they don’t tell you that), and essentially the same lifestyle (that once again turns out to be a low lifestyle because of the limited income.). Meanwhile they, the Democratic leadership themselves all keep their Million dollar homes, incomes, special rights, and millionaire lifestyle. They claim this as a priviledge for leading the country and making desicions regarding how the economy should be run.
Dudes, that’s exactly how a country a country called the USSR was run. And you see how THAT ended up.
At least the Republicans don’t attempt to be such bold face liars. They don’t claim to be “Champions Of The Poor”. No, they are certainly not the perfect choice to run the country, but they’re better then the alternative. I’m not a big supporter of John McCain, but given his HUGE advantage in experience he’s a hell of a better choice then Obama or Hillary. I’m not so sure he can save the economy, but I beleive he can make the best choices when it comes to Iraq and how to pull us out of there with a victory. And that’s what we need. A straight, immediate pull out of the troops will only worsen the situation both abroad and here in the States.
Here are the websites that I gathered Obama’s info from:
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4527239&page=1
and
http://abcnews.go.com/images/Blotter/summary_tax_obama.pdf
One last thing ADA, as of 2005, President Bush’s Total Assets were valued at 11.5 Million Dollars. I’m sure they’ve gone up since then, but not too much. Given that he was busy running the country and all. Here’s my source for this information:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/13/AR2005051301376.html
Warren
April 3, 2008 at 8:57 am
Obama is a fake. Only fools think otherwise. Clinton has helped more black people in this country than Obama will EVER do in his career.
Henry
May 2, 2008 at 3:45 pm